Work

by Jack Mottram, a freelance writer based in Glasgow · About · Contact · Feed

EJ Major: Try To Do Things We Can All Understand

· ·

Try To Do Things We Can All Un­der­stand, London-based artist EJ Major’s first solo exhibit, takes its title from the first work on show, a wall of monitors showing stills from 29 films ac­com­pan­ied by matching lines of dialogue, each displayed at random.

At first, it is hard not to treat the piece as a sort of quick-fire film quiz, racking one’s brains to identify a given still or quote, but as images and texts fade into one another the fragments begin to form a loose narrative.

A glimpse of Bette Davis sitting in the back of a car, her eyes downcast, calls up the breakdown of the Hollywood star system and Davis’ fiery feud with Joan Crawford. Robert Redford, looking es­pe­ci­ally craggy beside a roaring camp fire, points to the double standard that allows male actors to play romantic leads into their 70s while their female coun­ter­parts struggle to find a part, a thought re­in­for­ced by the ap­pear­ance of ex­cep­tions to the rule, Meryl Streep or Sigourney Weaver. When Christian Slater and Patricia Arquette pop up, silently mouthing Tarantino’s clever-clever bon mots from True Romance, Hans Zimmer’s tinkly reworking of Carl Orff’s Musica Poetica seems to fill the gallery. More gen­er­ic­ally, pas­sion­ate kisses and violent tempers, steely gazes and weeping women, hove into view, flagging up cinematic clichés and stock shots, the trite tactics directors fall back on to elicit an almost con­di­tioned response in their audience.

These com­mon­places aside, each viewer will bring their own set of memories and as­so­ci­a­tions, reading these fleeting, ran­dom­ised images to write their own, personal story, just as Major’s reasons for choosing these par­t­ic­u­lar scenes from these par­t­ic­u­lar films are unknown, rooted in her own private as­so­ci­a­tions.

The snippets of dialogue work in parallel to the images, and, with the odd exception - Marylin Monroe’s memorable cry of ‘You’re three dear sweet dead men!’ in John Huston’s The Misfits - are hard to place. Free of specific as­so­ci­a­tions, these brief, often prosaic texts allow a more specific, though in­ev­it­ably fractured, narrative to reveal itself, with a question, ‘Why are you doing this?’, answered crypt­ic­ally, ‘She looks very small.’

Taken together, the gobbets of dialogue and freeze-framed images form a densely woven work, concerned with the viewer’s response, that un­a­void­able urge to impose an ordered narrative on this dis­order­ed present­a­tion of Major’s filmic auto­bi­o­graphy, a taught essay on the tension between text and image in the language of cinema, and a med­it­a­tion on the power of shared symbolism.

Auto­bi­o­graphy, text and image underpin the most recent work on show, From A Distance, too. This time, the text is William Faulkner’s stream of con­s­cious­ness novel As I Lay Dying, which Major read and annotated at 17, an age at which she per­i­od­ic­ally lost the ability to speak, while the images are culled from the pages of Brownie annuals, and other sources less suitable for children. Major matches her teenage un­der­lin­ings, many of which reflect her personal, traumatic, re­la­tion­ship with language at the time, to the sanitised vision of girlhood provided by the comic strips. The result is a rather dis­com­fort­ing, if sometimes hilarious, psy­cho­sexu­al drama. The single word ‘steer’ is ac­com­pan­ied by a collaged image of a Girl Guide riding a flying penis, repeated instances of the word ‘laughing’ on a page are ac­com­pan­ied by line drawings of a lonely girl, sitting apart from he peers, and the phrase ‘it talks’ is il­lus­trated with an ex­as­per­ated mother and glum daughter. Some of these jux­ta­pos­i­tions are, I think, made with a wink, but the public, adult revising of private, juvenile pre­oc­cu­pa­tions, the remaking of a text already remade in the earlier act of an­not­a­tion, and the implied critique of the gender roles re­in­for­ced in children’s lit­er­at­ure combine to form a work that, like Try To Do Things We All Can Un­der­stand, offers a layered ex­am­in­a­tion of language, shared elements of popular culture and the divide between the public and the private.

This divide is explored more ex­pli­citly still in Marie Claire RIP. Twelve self-portraits show Major, first as a fresh-faced, peppy teen, ending up hollow-cheeked, battered, bruised and wearing filthy clothes. The series is based on an article in the titular magazine which featured mug-shots of an anonymous woman, taken over a fourteen-year period, to il­lus­trate the effects of heroin addiction. This is powerful stuff, and, once again, Major uses re­l­at­ively simple tactics to expose a broad range of concerns. The series is at once a memorial to the unknown woman and a co­r­us­c­at­ing attack, on both the as­sum­p­tion that her de­ter­i­or­at­ing ap­pear­ance is the most important aspect of this woman’s addiction, and the magazine’s intrusive use of the images, using the mug-shots to turn a private life into public property. It is, too, a nuanced look at the nature of pho­to­graphy, ques­tion­ing as­sum­p­tions of doc­u­ment­ary truth, and blurring the boun­d­ar­ies between the portrait and the self-portrait.

After this, the mail art project Love is… comes as something of a relief. In 2004, Major took screen­shots of every second of Ber­to­lu­c­ci’s Last Tango In Paris, printed postcards of each image and dis­trib­uted all 7,000 of them, ac­com­pan­ied by a note asking re­cip­i­ents to return the card along with their thoughts on the concept of love. The volume and range of responses is re­mark­able. A five year old girl defined love as ‘Mum and Dad’, an elderly lady returned the card unused, a polite note ex­plain­ing that, at 85, she had no use for Major’s services. Pre­dict­ably, there are several ex­as­per­ated requests that Major ‘get a life’ (from people who non­eth­e­less took the trouble to post the card), musings trite enough to grace a greetings card, and a slew of popular song lyrics.

This is an assured show, then, one that, across our distinct bodies of work deftly marries together musings on the con­sum­p­tion and dis­rup­tion of popular culture, gender and identity by making the private public.

This review was first published in The Herald in April 2008.